CleanasairMay2020

Terminating Membership on May 2021 from an organisation The BACP - British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy/ BACP that I named as Terrorist and promoting Modern Slavery Practices.

Please note that this organisation is not licensing because what it is my license to practice was and still are my degrees - my degrees are all accredited and licensed. The BACP is a nonsense organisation under Parliamentary Standards that have no official processes to check on it or accredit it - it is simply a fanthom organisation.

My charges are and still stand against the BACP and criminals: Emma Ulysses and Iain Dockerty of Croydon Health Services NHS with Criminal under Modern Slavery Act 2005 and Terrorism Act 2010

75 millions of pounds who pays for mental health in the NHS?

From me

To [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Mday, [email protected]

Date 25/10/2021 19:51

Contact photo

Message Body

I had to stop my membership fees so I can pursue this further. Now I am pursuing this further. I need details of the BACP insurance policy for public safety and I shall file two cases against professional conduct at BACP under insurance risk of public safety termed at 75, 000 000 pounds and a legal case.

Are we on the ball with this> any of you?

let me know? I shall also make available for publishing all correspondence on case including all correspondence received under my name by the BACP and all BACP respondents that is going to be filed under a new title called the BACP = who cares> by Dr Madalina Day and first author copy is going to be registered with the Parliamentary library like all present ones.

So I need the BACP insurance policy and type of insurance? who of you can get it?

DR/ Day

Re: (EXT) Documents as evidence for case MadalinaD 2020 and Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty and modern slavery act 2005 Transparency in processes

From me

To Gemma Fay Gemma Fay <[email protected]>

Date 24/08/2021 12:00

Contact photo

Message Body

Arlene has all emails in her inbox and my filing a legal ethical complaint against Emma Ulysses it was supposed to be actioned two months ago.

I have emailed Arlene a communication for professional and ethical conduct department at BACP. I have received no response.

Can you check with Arlene why formal complaint was not filed.

Professional conduct and ethics are lawful actions and I have actioned such lawful actions.

Please file Ethical Complaint against Emma Ulysses initiated by I with date of previous email from two months ago. There are criminal charges under Modern Slavery ACT 2015 and put forward all my correspondence for the BACP to action Article 12 and acknowledge criminal charges that I will put forward.

ROA from the police should arrive by the 5th of September 2021.

Please inform your legal department that I will start proceedings that will involve the BACP.

Many thanks.

On 24/08/2021 11:46, Gemma Fay wrote:

Dear Ms Day,

I can confirm receipt of your last emails which I have forwarded to be included as part of your formal response.

The documents you have requested by post have also been requested to be sent to you and you will receive these shortly.

Kind regards,

Gemma

From: me

Sent: 24 August 2021 11:36

To: Gemma Fay <[email protected]>; Mday <[email protected]>

Subject: (EXT) Documents as evidence for case MadalinaD 2020 and Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty and modern slavery act 2005 Transparency in processes

WARNING: This email originated from an External Source

And initial contract with below. Still formal response.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

Fwd: Documents as evidence for case MadalinaD 2020 and Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty and modern slavery act 2005 Transparency in processes

Date:

11/06/2021 10:39

From:

[email protected]

To:

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Copy:

[email protected]

Slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour

(1)A person commits an offence if—

(a)the person holds another person in slavery or servitude and the circumstances are such that the person knows or ought to know that the other person is held in slavery or servitude, or

(b)the person requires another person to perform forced or compulsory labour and the circumstances are such that the person knows or ought to know that the other person is being required to perform forced or compulsory labour.

(2)In subsection (1) the references to holding a person in slavery or servitude or requiring a person to perform forced or compulsory labour are to be construed in accordance with Article 4 of the Human Rights Convention.

(3)In determining whether a person is being held in slavery or servitude or required to perform forced or compulsory labour, regard may be had to all the circumstances.

(4)For example, regard may be had—

(a)to any of the person’s personal circumstances (such as the person being a child, the person’s family relationships, and any mental or physical illness) which may make the person more vulnerable than other persons;

(b)to any work or services provided by the person, including work or services provided in circumstances which constitute exploitation within section 3(3) to (6).

(5)The consent of a person (whether an adult or a child) to any of the acts alleged to constitute holding the person in slavery or servitude, or requiring the person to perform forced or compulsory labour, does not preclude a determination that the person is being held in slavery or servitude, or required to perform forced or compulsory labour.

Ashley,

When can we arrange a call and given the sensitivity of the matter and urgency of the matter, I would like to proceed with legal action with immediate effect under Modern Slavery Act 2015 and defamation and libel, intimidation, harassment and under accusations under false accusations under the GDPR 2018. But criminal offence comes first and foremost for forced labour/servitude and expectations entailed within the Act in accordance with Article 4 of Human Rights Convention. The actions and conduct of Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty are that of and constitute offences under the following legislation:

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

Fwd: Documents as evidence for case MadalinaD 2020 and Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty and modern slavery act 2005 Transparency in processes

Date:

10/06/2021 09:50

From:

To:

"[email protected] [email protected]"

Correction: Last time I communicated with Emma Ulysses was in January 2020 when I post it her Batman Postcard from New York at cost of $5 and books from the Croydon University Hospital Postgraduate Library.

Please email to Emma all documents previously sent to you. The only contract that I recognise and see valid is the one attached. Work started prior to the contract in 2014. I was registrant on the BACP in 2016.

The below legislation applies and it is a criminal offence amongst other things. I can take this legal action not to the trust or to Emma as a personnel of the trust but to both Emma and Iain as citizens and individuals who have used their position to intimidate and victimise me where there was no longer an established relationship between their formal employment and I.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

Documents as evidence for case MadalinaD 2020 and Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty and modern slavery act 2005

Date:

10/06/2021 09:14

From:

To:

[email protected]

This is the contract as honorary from Croydon please observe that in spite of having my full name , the HR decided to make a contract with my second name and even that spelled incorrectly. within the terms of the contract there are clear stipulations that disciplinary action is taken internally should any challenges would arise and legally I am protected by the trust itself under the honorary contract. My work with the trust was completed in October 2019 but my work with the NHS staff from that Trust and other is ongoing in private. The trust is still part my client.

I am making a formal application of legal basis with the evidence provided to the BACP by Emma Ulysses and strongly assert that the evidence is self-incriminatory and assert that a number of offences had taken place in the past and currently. I would request the panel to consider suitability of Emma Ulysses as a member of the BACP and I am considering legal action against the trust under Modern Slavery Act 2005 that stipulates:

Slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour

(1)A person commits an offence if—

(a)the person holds another person in slavery or servitude and the circumstances are such that the person knows or ought to know that the other person is held in slavery or servitude, or

(3)In determining whether a person is being held in slavery or servitude or required to perform forced or compulsory labour, regard may be had to all the circumstances.

(4)For example, regard may be had—

(b)to any work or services provided by the person, including work or services provided in circumstances which constitute exploitation within section 3(3) to (6).

IN email provided by myself from correspondence with Iain Docherty there was an expectation that I meet with Emma Ulysses for consultancy free of charge where my duties to management had completed end of 2019 - not to the NHS staff that I still have under safeguarding and ethical procedures, and because I did not, there were grave repercussions with calling the police, being contacted by Data Officer at home address etc including the BACP.

All subsequent actions upon my refusal to meet with Emma except if paid for my work, were continuation of harassments, discriminatory and to force me into free labour. The ofences upon continuing the honorary contract past the renewal in 2016 is forced labor under the Modern Slavery Act 2005. I had patients and clients that were clinically acutely ill, whole departments that were and are at forefront of public safety and public services and even when I continued such services for the good of all, it seems that when I stopped are grave consequences that I did so.

The evidence and allegations by Emma Ulysses and others at the trust have no basis, no ground. The BACP needs to remember that the TRUST is not made up by two or one individual even if that individual is part of OH or counselling service, the TRUST is made up by the staff.

I have never used any references from Emma Ulysses other than what it was provided by her - I have emails from her with such reference. The legal department gave me a letter recently that again has my name wrong on it and the date of honorary contract wrong on it. I pointed that out but it was no change. Last time I communicated with Emma was beginning of 2019 when I posted books from the library. I need to remind the BACP that disciplinary procedure was never used for my honorary contract and no one external or internal had ever made any allegations ever. I have completed over 5000 clinical hours at the TRUST. I still and will always have such records - it is my duty and professional conduct to keep notes, reflections and records of my clients - all my clients from every where and every setting. The allegations are self-incriminatory for Emma Ulysses and the TRUST and as such I request the use of article 12.1 with considering whether or not I should forgive Emma Ulysses for her conduct and expectations that I will somehow forget how to keep my records or read a contract of honorary status including the disciplinary procedures. The BACP needs to consider why the HR and Emma herself keeps calling me Andreea when They had my signature on all emails as to who I am. Andreea is only used by my family as it is my second name and I never gave permission to HR at Croydon to be my family.

I would like to forgive Emma and the TRUST but Can I?

This is my final document to consider.

Regards,

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

Fwd: Croydon Health Services - Honorary Contract

Date:

10/06/2021 08:51

From:

m e

To:

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Baichoo Rachel (RJ6) MHC-TR Human Resources <[email protected]>

Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM

Subject: Croydon Health Services - Honorary Contract

To: me

Cc: Armstrong Angela (RJ6) MHC-TR <[email protected]>

As requested

Kind regards

Rachel Baichoo

Recruitment Administrator

Croydon University Hospital

530 London Road

Croydon

CR7 7YE

t. 020 8401 3815

Subject:Re: Request for Dissolution of the BACP under terrorism Act, Modern Slavery act practices 2015 and Ethical Violence practices

From

To Suzanne Dodds,<[email protected]>

Copy Accreditation TeamAdd to whitelistAdd to blacklist, InfoAdd to whitelistAdd to blacklist

Date 30/03/2022 15:25

This is not good enough, act on my complaint request, Suzanne. I have not been informed on whatever decisions you have taken on the two separate issues - Act on my instructions and keep your co-joint deliberations to a legal case.

Suzanne confirm acknowledgement of second complaint.

Mel worked harder on you 11 days response because it is now 24 hours late that would cost the UK Parliamentary Government around 9 Billions of pounds and you would not have a job by the end of April 2022 - these are facts not threats.

Shall I write the above in a different way or all clear?

Regards,

On 30/03/2022 15:19, Suzanne Dodds wrote:

Dear Me

Mel and I have jointly considered and reviewed the different aspects of your concern and I will respond substantively to you on this by the end of the week including what any next steps may be.

Regards,

Suzanne

Suzanne Dodds

Head of Governance

Professional Standards Authority

157-197 Buckingham Palace Road

London SW1W 9SP

www.professionalstandards.org.uk

Direct line: 020 7389 8025

Switchboard: 020 7389 8030

Fax: 020 7389 8040

For more information regarding the Authority's privacy policies please see our privacy notice https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/docs/default-source/publications/privacy-notice.pdf?sfvrsn=ee1f7220_2

From: me

Sent: 30 March 2022 14:51

To: Accreditation Team <[email protected]>; Suzanne Dodds <[email protected]>

Cc: Info <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Request for Dissolution of the BACP under terrorism Act, Modern Slavery act practices 2015 and Ethical Violence practices

EXTERNAL: This email originated from outside the Authority.

hello Mel,

WE have sixteen working days with no response, please file a complaint against yourself based on a non-response from your behalf - a second one at stage one - and please do respond to my email within the next 24 hours before I consider legal action and acting on criminal charges.

Thank you. Suzanne, start processing complaint of non-response within the time frame set for breaching trust in principles of Standard 1 to 8 all inclusive and acknowledge complaint stage 1 of complaint file against accreditation team with todays' date - different complaint - my reference is DR009/SUzanneCompl/Mel?aCCRED

Regards,

On 14/03/2022 15:44, Accreditation Team wrote:

Dea me

Thank you for your email below.

We had not looked further into your query, since at your previous email on 6 March 2022 (in the email train below) you asked that we do not contact you again.

Now that you've got in touch again, I will aim to respond to your questions below sent on 11 March, within ten working days.

Best wishes

Mel

Mel Venables

Head of Accreditation

www.professionalstandards.org.uk

Switchboard: 020 7389 8030

Mobile: 07525769928

Fax: 020 7389 8040

_____________________________________________________________________________

The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care

From: me

Sent: 11 March 2022 14:37

To: Accreditation Team <[email protected]>; Info <[email protected]>;

Subject: Request for Dissolution of the BACP under terrorism Act, Modern Slavery act practices 2015 and Ethical Violence practices

EXTERNAL: This email originated from outside the Authority.

before I will take this further on your organisation I shall give your organisation one chance to investigate the following two questions:

1. If I am not a member of the BACP through I terminating - termination and non-payment and declared the BACP as a client organisation - given that would be the only possible explanation for its behaviour - how is it possible that a panel investigates and meets to discuss whether or not my membership should remain active?

2. By refusing to act on their own standards, the BACP had violated their standards, their members' standards and principles of good practice and as a 3. third point made a public notice about a non member being excluded from a membership on a timeline that does not exist.

The questions you need to ask the BACP are the following:

1When I have paid my membership last. 2.Have they acknowledged invoice submitted in August 2021? 3. When was the panel meeting about my membership, meaning date? 4. What is the date of the public notice December 2021 and what evidence is discussing in relation to what membership?

The points above will cover my taking you to Court - I need to remind you that I am a legal entity and not a physical person.

I give you five working days to respond in full.

Regards,

DR. Madalina Day/ New Beginnings Therapy

On 06/03/2022 13:36, [email protected] wrote:

I will drop this. I have no longer an interest in this activity. I am not interested in your response or your investigation or processes.

Reason: my colleagues (former). They need to have an association they can relate to and earn their livelihood - even if that association had attacked me merciless, undeservedly and to my EYE it is unworthy. It is part of a system, that will continue to exist no matter what.

I will not fight something that stands for something or so to the illusion of millions of people - it is not my purpose in life to destroy, but to rebuild. In this case, I will do neither.

Here is a link to what I am saying: Matt LeBlanc and Jimmy Debate How Many Claps Are in the Friends Theme Song - YouTube

Don't contact me again or ever.

Regards,

On 03/03/2022 08:41, me wrote:

Dear Mel and others,

I am writing to request a response in writing of acknowledgment of my concern regarding one of the accredited organisations by your Authority, namely The British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy.(BACP)

I am also acknowledging that your organisation is regulating the BACP but you do not have a process in place for formally investigating this association. I am also acknowledging that your organisation, like the BACP is directly linked the The UK Parliament and therefore both your organisations-Professional Standards Authority and the BACP are in fact public bodies. A claim against one is a claim against the other through legislative processes and by association.

I do acknowledge that The Professional Standards Authority had exhausted all its processes- none existent- to formally investigate one of your accredited organisations such as the BACP.

Please do acknowledge that your final response to my process of raiding a concern is now exhausted and I can commence complaint procedures against your organisation through the Privy Council. Unless the above is responded to and follows an internal procedures of complaints or acute concerns with your organisation about your organisation and links to one of accredited organisations, such as the BACP.

Best regards,

DR.Madalina Day

On 25/02/2022 15:18, [email protected] wrote:

Dear all ,

If you would like to consider my concern not a sharing of experience but a sharing of facts. If you need to submit it and formulate it for your own understanding in a different format than please do so.

I am not sharing an experience I am requesting that you action immediate dissolve of the BACP/ British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy as I am accusing them of ethical violence, terrorism and practices classed under modern slavery act 2015.

The evidence is below:

Professional Conduct notice / Madalina Day (bacp.co.uk)

and attached. I ceased my membership of this organisation and no payment had been effectuated since May 2021.

The reason I have done so, it is because I was approached in 2021 about a contract I had with Croydon Health Services between 2015 and 2019.

In 2020 and 2021 I had no such contract of honorary employment and any conversations with members of staff were regarding a training withdrawn in 2017.

If there were any issues related to that contract than members of organisation should have contacted the BACP at that time. The person who put the complaint through had no professional relationship with I since 2019 upon terminating the honorary contract. In effect the complaint and the complainant had no professional relationship with me at time of complaint and it was a fourth party to bring allegations and accusations that were at all times impossible.

The police investigated the matter under my referral to the police for harassment , unethical requests and breach of all rights including human rights and expectations of work for free when no contract was in place. - modern slavery expectations and practices.

The BACP had no basis of investigating the complaint because there was no active contract in place between that organisation and I and all communications were strictly criminal on part of organisation A - Croydon Health Services NHS Trust Emma Ulysses and Iain Docherty.

The BACP ignored my warnings and proceeded with an investigation under own standards of practice being violated and in December 2021 ejected that public notice where my BACP membership was effectively terminated in August 2021.

I will take a stance against the BACP in all forms - I have offered three choices recently and it looks like choice Three is in effect - I will go after all and I shall not stop until the BACP ceases to exist and equally and similarly your organisation.

This is not sharing an experience - this is a formal request to withdraw the BACP of the register and cease their existence as an accredited Standard Professional Body.

I am attaching invoice as to what the BACP owes me at this point in time.

Regards,

Dr. Me

On 24/02/2022 09:30, Accreditation Team wrote:

Dear Me

Thank you for your email below.

As discussed, the Professional Standards Authority accredits BACP. As part of this we check that it meets our Standards for Accredited Registers. You can find our Standards here: https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/docs/default-source/accredited-registers/standards-for-accredited-registers/standards-for-accredited-registers.pdf?sfvrsn=cc2c7f20_6. More information about how we assess and accredit Registers here: annual-review-process-guide.pdf (professionalstandards.org.uk).

As part of our assessments against the Standards we consider feedback from individuals and stakeholders about the Accredited Register. The form for doing this is here although we can provide in alternative accessible formats if needed: 161104-share-your-experience-of-an-accredited-register-form.docx (live.com). Please note that we are not a complaints body, and cannot guarantee that we will be able to provide a detailed response to all concerns received about an Accredited Register. However, we may be in touch to ask for more information so that we can look at concerns which may present a risk to patient or public safety. If you are engaged in legal proceedings then we will not be able to consider until they have concluded. I am unclear from your email and our phone conversation whether this is the case.

Although in the first instance the Accreditation Team would be happy to consider any complaints about our work to see if we can resolve them, we also have a route for submitting a corporate complaint. Details of how to do this can be found here: https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/about-us/make-a-complaint-about-us.

I hope this is information is useful.

Best wishes

Mel

Mel Venables

Head of Accreditation

www.professionalstandards.org.uk

Switchboard: 020 7389 8030

Mobile: 07525769928

Fax: 020 7389 8040

_____________________________________________________________________________

The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care

From: me

Sent: 23 February 2022 15:59

To: Melanie Venables <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Me

Cc: Accreditation Team <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Legal notice under the claim Our Ref: DAMZ55IN01/3921 - towergate and your policy reference number is 102878170 for Markel Law claims for legal expensesA police

EXTERNAL: This email originated from outside the Authority.

Dear all,

Thank you. The below is erronated as my criminal charges against the BACP is a parallel process and that would involve your organisation. As such, I am looking at a complaint against the BACP. However, I would like to go through a complaints procedure whereas I will bring the criminal charges against the Professional Standards Agency and the BACP together - to keep you all tight and neat.

This is a formal request for complaints procedure, contact details and framework. I shall expect that imminently.

Given that I am not a BACP member, I shall refer back from 2012 up to and including February 2022.

Best regards,

On 31/01/2022 17:10, Melanie Venables wrote:

Dear Me

Thank you for your email below, and those others which we have received.

I am afraid we do not appear to be able to look at this concern at the moment, since it appears you are liaising with the BACP on legal proceedings.

Best wishes

Mel

Mel Venables

Head of Accreditation

www.professionalstandards.org.uk

Switchboard: 020 7389 8030

Mobile: 07525769928

Fax: 020 7389 8040

_____________________________________________________________________________

The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care

From: me

Sent: 31 January 2022 16:23

To: [email protected]; Info <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Accreditation Team <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Me

Subject: Legal notice under the claim Our Ref: DAMZ55IN01/3921 - towergate and your policy reference number is 102878170 for Markel Law claims for legal expensesA police

EXTERNAL: This email originated from outside the Authority.

A police officer under the Rights of Access - ROA is also copied - I can BBC him/her/they but I shall not because their report is dated August 2020 and I have not received any other report from investigator - but what I have it is beyond sufficient - however, none of individuals or organisations are authorized to make references to the ROA Police Officer email address or enquiries. If any of you - copied in this email address - does or do, I shall prosecute you with criminal charges with immediate effect for corruption of justice and attempt of intimidation.

I am making this information available because it needs to be forwarded (internally) by the police to appropriate department dealing with these Criminal charges.

If this case is discussed in any way outside remit of your own organisation, I shall press criminal charges against each and every one who would take such action under preventing the court of justice. Guess, how I will know!

THE PRIORITY HERE IS CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST THE BACP AND ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS.

Regards,

Dr. Me